For my own knowledge - mass vs weight

Discussion in 'General Education' started by time out, Aug 29, 2012.

  1. time out

    time out Comrade

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0

    Aug 29, 2012

    Hi guys. I know that mass is the amount of matter in an object and weight is the pull of gravity on an object but here's what I don't understand.

    How can grams be used to measure mass? Let's say an object is 200 grams - which would be like 200 paper clips, right? Would the object still be 200 grams in space? Doesn't a gram measure weight, not mass? So confused.

    And how can we effectively teach the difference between the two when all students' experiences are grounded on Earth, where the terms weight and mass can be used interchangeably?
     
  2.  
  3. Peregrin5

    Peregrin5 Maven

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,770
    Likes Received:
    1,005

    Aug 29, 2012

    The paper clip would remain 200 grams. Grams do not measure weight, but because of common usage, we tend to say "weigh the mass of". The correct verb would be, "I need to find the mass of this." In addition, a mass scale isn't the same as a weight scale. A mass scale takes the weight of an object, corrects for the gravitational constant, and provides the mass.

    The best way to teach it I think would be to compare the weight of a person when on different planets, i.e. the moon, or Jupiter, etc. The person would remain the same mass (i.e., they're made up of the same parts, but because of the gravity of the planet, their weight would be different).

    Tell students that when people are trying to lose weight, they are technically trying to lose mass. =]
     
  4. chemteach55

    chemteach55 Connoisseur

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,710
    Likes Received:
    13

    Aug 29, 2012

    The SI unit for mass is the kilogram and the SI unit for weight is the newton.
     
  5. KateL

    KateL Habitué

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    2

    Aug 29, 2012

    Think of measuring mass on one of those balances with two pans. You put the paper clips on one side and a 200g weight on the other side, and it balances. It would still balance if you did this on the moon. If you step on a scale on the moon, though, you won't weigh as much because gravity isn't pulling you down as much.
     
  6. ChemTeachBHS

    ChemTeachBHS Comrade

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    16

    Aug 29, 2012

    When I taught physics I would make my students calculate their weight on different planets and the moon so they could see how gravity affects it. Because their mass was always the same but the weight changed.
     
  7. time out

    time out Comrade

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0

    Aug 30, 2012

    I think I'm starting to get it. So let's say you use snap cubes instead. If an object is balanced by 20 snap cubes on Earth, it should also be balanced by 20 snap cubes in space, right?
     
  8. Mathemagician

    Mathemagician Groupie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    0

    Aug 30, 2012

    My HS physics teacher did the same thing!
     
  9. TeacherGroupie

    TeacherGroupie Moderator

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    29,799
    Likes Received:
    1,168

    Aug 30, 2012

    Well, assuming that both the snap cubes and the item would stay in the balance pans, yes. They'd certainly balance on the moon.

    What's more, this is why a proper scientific scale is a balance scale: since gravity is acting on both sides of the scale, it factors out.
     

Share This Page

Members Online Now

  1. Missy
Total: 357 (members: 1, guests: 330, robots: 26)
test