We actually participated in this-and I can't say it made me teach any better knowing that if my student's made the gains expected I would get a small bonus. I think the good teachers are already doing everything they can and the not-so-good teachers often somehow pull out high test scores anyway-even if it's just because all they do is teach the test. I really don't like how the article even says teachers were expected to "push" for higher test scores and they chose schools who were already doing well to participate.
Ceasing to teach science and social studies in K-3 because they don't get tested is wildly counterproductive. When are kids supposed to get the vocabulary and background knowledge they'll need to have already when those subjects do start getting tested? And what will they do in the meantime if a passage on the test happens (as it will) to involve a topic having to do with science or social studies?
__________________
Education isn't what you know. It's what you can do (and fake, intelligently) with what you know. http://www.testmaven.com
In addition, the way to reach many of our lower or reluctant students is through science and social studies topics. I have had many students who refused to pick up a book in English, but would devour books about Ancient Egypt during Social Studies periods.
__________________
It does not matter how slowly you go so long as you do not stop
Confucius