Zumba Prostitute

Discussion in 'Teacher Time Out' started by JustMe, Oct 16, 2012.

  1. Caesar753

    Caesar753 Multitudinous

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,471
    Likes Received:
    2,488

    Oct 18, 2012

    The issue of whether prostitution should be legal/illegal is a separate discussion.

    As it stands, prostitution is illegal in most places, and the guys who paid for sex knew or should have known that. I don't see a problem with their names getting published in the paper. I assume that the paper also publishes other arrests, like DUIs, domestic violence, theft, etc. Those things would all be embarrassing to kids whose parents were arrested for those things. I guess I feel like if the parent doesn't want family members feeling embarrassed, then he shouldn't do anything that will get his name in the paper.
     
  2. TeacherNY

    TeacherNY Phenom

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    4,175
    Likes Received:
    849

    Oct 19, 2012

    I think if your town publishes other crimes in the local paper then this should be no different. They really should have thought about their families before they acted like idiots.
     
  3. Aliceacc

    Aliceacc Multitudinous

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    27,534
    Likes Received:
    6

    Oct 19, 2012

    True.

    But the choices of a bad parent shouldn't mean that the kids get punished. And you KNOW they would.

    I just don't see any purpose in doing it. It's not that knowing such information keeps me or my kids safer. There's no reason I need to know such information, other than to keep the neighborhood gossips happy. And it does hurt the spouse and the kids, who have committed no crimes.

    I think we can agree that the people who make such choices probably aren't thinking about the best interests of their families anyway.

    I just don't see what the point is. Why is this information I need to know?
     
  4. 3Sons

    3Sons Connoisseur

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,986
    Likes Received:
    144

    Oct 21, 2012

    We should keep in mind that so far, these people are just accused of a crime, not convicted of one. Suppose a name of someone who was innocent had mistakenly been put on the list? There's a legitimate business attached, so it's not that far-fetched. And if that's the case, you're effectively punishing them without a hearing ( because the offense is minor, the real punishment is the public outing).
     
  5. Cerek

    Cerek Aficionado

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,094
    Likes Received:
    0

    Oct 21, 2012

    What about the johns that are single? Should they be humiliated as well?


    I agree, Caesar. If you don't want to embarrass your family or loved ones, then you shouldn't do anything that might get your name printed in the paper. I also agree that, if the paper publishes other arrests, they should publish this one as well. Our local paper publishes the Sheriff's Arrest Report every week, regardless of the charges.

    Those are good points, Alice. I would imagine the editors of the paper feel they are providing a community service. Since arrest records are public information, some papers (especially in smaller, rural towns, may feel it is part of their duty or responsibility to report the information. Arrests are news. We see them on the news and read them in the paper all the time. The more "sensational" arrests often warrant a story of their own in the paper. By publishing the arrest records, the paper is also informing the public about the less "sensational" arrests that occurred during the past week or month.

    It does also provide fodder for gossips, but they would likely get that information somehow anyway and the paper at least publishes the facts, rather than rumors or hearsay. I suppose if some readers feel they don't need to know the information, they can just skip that section. I rarely ever read the arrest report in my local paper.

    This is another excellent point, 3Sons. We need to remember all of these men are considered innocent until proven guilty and that many of them have the same name as other men in the area. It would be very easy to falsely accuse (or humiliate) the wrong person in a case like this if someone else with the same name (and similar age) also attended Zuma classes there.
     
  6. John Lee

    John Lee Groupie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,462
    Likes Received:
    43

    Oct 22, 2012

    I beg to differ with you.
    First of all, the issue of legality is a separate discussion, but it also is related (to the discussion) too. Because the law says it, doesn't make it wrong. Would you (not you literally) like it if they put your face on the newspaper anytime you have had sex? Of course not. If you think about it, the only difference (between that and prostitution) is the exchange of currency.

    The second issue is that those things you chose to cite (DUIs, domestic violence, theft) are crimes with victims. Prostitution (in/of itself) has no victim. It is between consenting adults.
     
  7. Cerek

    Cerek Aficionado

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,094
    Likes Received:
    0

    Oct 22, 2012

    I have to challenge the assertion that prostitution is a victimless crime. Many women ( and young girls) are forced into prostitution. They don't have a choice in the matter.

    Others are addicted to drugs and resort to prostitution for drugs or money to buy drugs. So I feel many prostitutes are[\i] victims of their profession for different reasons.
     
  8. Caesar753

    Caesar753 Multitudinous

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,471
    Likes Received:
    2,488

    Oct 22, 2012

    The difference is that I'm not breaking any laws by getting it on with my hoosband. The fact is that whether you agree with it or not, prostitution is illegal in most places.

    There are many crimes that some people consider to be "victimless", like loitering and not wearing seatbelts. Victimless crime or not, people who are found to be doing those things will still get cited, arrested, and/or reported in the paper. I don't see how prostitution is any different. Is it?



    I agree with Cerek on this one. Most prostitutes aren't prostitutes because they love the lifestyle. Most of them do it because they are coerced, addicted to drugs, and/or trafficked. Prostitution isn't a victimless crime, and my argument is that the prostitutes themselves are most often the victims.
     
  9. JustMe

    JustMe Virtuoso

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,946
    Likes Received:
    3

    Oct 22, 2012

    Also agree with Cerek...
     
  10. John Lee

    John Lee Groupie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,462
    Likes Received:
    43

    Oct 22, 2012

    My point (admittedly maybe not a very good example) is that you wouldn't want to be in the paper for having sex (even if it is with your husband). It would be embarrassing, both personally and professionally. Why criminalize someone any more than they already are, when they didn't harm anybody?

    You seem to want to affix a modern day Scarlet Letter on folks who's moral standards may not measure up to yours. Bear in mind, I'm not arguing against the practice of publishing other crimes (violence, theft... I'm not crazy about it necessarily either.) But in terms of "crimes" that don't directly harm others, it seems extremely punitive to publicly embarrass them too.
     
  11. PolarBear

    PolarBear Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2012
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0

    Oct 22, 2012

    I have a good friend that would strongly disagree over whether sex within the confines of marriage or a relationship does not involve the exchange of currency. His divorce ran him in the low seven-figures. :eek: After this especially bitter, protracted battle, his love life could best be described as the "pay as you go" variety. In his own words, "I didn't pay her $XXX to spend the night, I paid her to leave in the morning."

    I hope everyone realizes I don't necessarily agree with his point of view, but I certainly understand it.
     
  12. Caesar753

    Caesar753 Multitudinous

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,471
    Likes Received:
    2,488

    Oct 22, 2012

    Dude. You're reading far, far, far too much into my responses. I'm about as far away from a Scarlet Letter mentality as a person can get. This issue isn't about morality; it's about legality. I don't give a hoot who has sex with whom or under what circumstances the arrangement occurred.

    My point is that prostitution IS already on the books as a crime. If you want to change that, then change it. Then I'll be all for not publishing the names of people who solicited or offered sex in exchange for money. Until that time, however, it should be treated like any other crime.

    And for the record, I could give a rat's patoot about whether I appear in the paper for getting it on within the confines of the law.
     
  13. Linguist92021

    Linguist92021 Phenom

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,724
    Likes Received:
    951

    Oct 22, 2012


    There is a HUGE, HUGE !! difference between having sex with a husband / boyfriend / someone in the same committed relationship, and having sex with a stranger for money, who does the same thing with others all the time. It is wrong morally, and it is a crime. I don't see how the 2 can be compared.
     
  14. Linguist92021

    Linguist92021 Phenom

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,724
    Likes Received:
    951

    Oct 22, 2012


    I agree. It would be of great information for me to know that there is a rapist, killer or burglar in my neighborhood. I need to know that so that I can be more careful. As far as a guy having sex with a pro, it doesn't really concern me, because our paths will never cross.
     
  15. John Lee

    John Lee Groupie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,462
    Likes Received:
    43

    Oct 23, 2012

    I said it wasn't a good example. The point was in relating the nature of a "crime" that involves sex (consentual in this case), and its embarrassment level to the so-called perpetrator.

    Caesar,
    You know it would be embarrassing on some level to publish your sex life. That's my point. There is a distinction between certain crimes and those of a sexual nature. There is an additional distinction (line) where the crime in question doesn't involve harming another individual.

    The issue IS morality. Of course it's LEGAL for the newspaper to publish the people (I'm assuming that is what you mean by it being a legal issue). By saying you have no problem with all these people being publicly named in the paper, you are speaking from your own moral POV.
     
  16. Irishdave

    Irishdave Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    12

    Oct 23, 2012

    There is a big debate over whether it is a victimless crime or not.

    When you add in; the white slavery, the illegal drugs, the spread of STDs, and the affect it has on marriages. Together It is hardly a victimless crime, True if a man pays a woman for sex and none of above happen I guess it might be somewhat victimless.
     
  17. MissCeliaB

    MissCeliaB Aficionado

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,221
    Likes Received:
    427

    Oct 23, 2012

    They publish all mugshots on our local newspaper's website. Well, everyone who's being charged as an adult.
     
  18. Accountable

    Accountable Companion

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0

    Oct 23, 2012

    In my opinion:

    No one should have their name or face plastered all over town for being accused of a crime - any crime. Everyone's identity should be protected (exactly as we protect a child's identity) unless and until there is a conviction. Then they can release all the gory little details. The police can notify the families without having the media notify the public.

    For those that think the papers want to publish the names only to keep the community informed, it's time to wake up. Smut sells, and that's the one and only reason for publishing these names ... the gossip value.

    Prostitution in and of itself is a victimless crime. Passing on STDs is not a crime, and if it were it still would be without prostitution. Likewise abusing or victimizing young girls.

    Did I miss anything? ;)
     
  19. Cerek

    Cerek Aficionado

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,094
    Likes Received:
    0

    Oct 23, 2012

    No. The "legality" of the issue is the fact that prostitution is currently illegal, the same as smoking pot is illegal (which many others consider to be a "victimless crime"). Whether someone agrees with the law or not is rather moot. Right now, it IS against the law, so engaging in the activity IS a crime.

    My local paper is one that does publish the arresting report every week. They report all the arrests and the charges filed. They show no discrimination in the type of charge nor the person being charged. If papers published all the arrests, except prostitution, there could be claims of "favoritism" towards those that might have been caught soliciting the prostitute.

    It has nothing to do with different values of morality; if a person commits ANY crime and is arrested for that crime, their name goes in the local paper. If a person does NOT want their name in the paper, then all they have to do is NOT commit a crime. Pretty simple solution when you think about it.
     
  20. Aliceacc

    Aliceacc Multitudinous

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    27,534
    Likes Received:
    6

    Oct 23, 2012

    No, they have to not be ACCUSED of committing a crime.

    In this country, the two are not the same thing. "Arrested" does not imply guilt.
     

Share This Page

test