Let's talk school shootings

Discussion in 'General Education' started by Caesar753, Jan 23, 2018.

  1. a2z

    a2z Maven

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    5,599
    Likes Received:
    1,485

    Feb 23, 2018

    I understand what you are saying, but in the mean time how do you protect students from the random student who wants to shoot up a school? Or is that something we should not address in any form of policing way but only do so in wealthy areas that are not as used to being surrounded by gun violence?

    I saw on the re-play of the gathering at the White House that teachers from DC said they have entrance metal detectors and student searches at the only open entrances to the school and multiple armed officers at the school. She seemed to believe it produced a safe learning environment and the students did not mind. This was in a high-crime, high-poverty area of DC.
     
  2. a2z

    a2z Maven

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    5,599
    Likes Received:
    1,485

    Feb 23, 2018

    Really? Our country has no community any more. We are divided. Mistakes are seen as *insert negative term here*. Kids are surrounded by violence and ideas that are really beyond their understanding on a continual basis. Kids who are kept from those types of things are seen as protected as if something is wrong with not having kids know about more adult ideas at a young age. Every kid is expected to be THE BEST at everything. If they drop their guard for a moment, they are seen as not doing enough.

    Parents are under huge pressure from change in finances, expectations, and information overload. No matter what they do society is telling them they are wrong. (Just like teachers are getting from society.) Which puts families on edge. Then on top of that broken home after broken home.

    Nothing is wrong and everything is wrong all at the same time. I wouldn't want to be a kid these days.
     
    Backroads and Obadiah like this.
  3. Tyler B.

    Tyler B. Groupie

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    433

    Feb 23, 2018

    The NRA reveres the constitution, a document that also laid out how slaves would be regarded. We changed the slave thing because it was wrong. The gun thing is wrong too. We need to change it.
     
    Upsadaisy likes this.
  4. Caesar753

    Caesar753 Multitudinous

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,471
    Likes Received:
    2,488

    Feb 23, 2018

    "But the movement for hardening isn’t just impractical or lacking in evidentiary support; it’s also a dystopian stroke of authoritarianism that runs deeply counter to the ideas embodied in the Constitution. Increasingly militarized school resource officers don’t just passively wait for mass shootings; they have daily encounters with students that appear to be increasing in frequency. Brutality is endemic. Mother Jones chronicled 28 serious student injuries and one death from 2010 to 2015 in such encounters. The brunt of those brutal incidents and arrests falls on black students, and high-profile incidents of officers kicking students, choking them, handcuffing third-graders, and slamming students to the ground are all too common."

    "As Coaston writes, these setups will almost certainly tend towards gross violations of students’ First Amendment rights to speech and Fourth Amendment rights to privacy, and will do so along already-established lines of race and class."
     
    MsAbeja likes this.
  5. a2z

    a2z Maven

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    5,599
    Likes Received:
    1,485

    Feb 23, 2018

    Thank you.

    These things are happening to students of all colors. I've seen quite a number of elementary aged kids in the news handcuffed that were not black. I've personally seen white teens put to the ground by the SROs.

    The question then becomes, is the problem a few rogue officers, poor training on de-escalation procedures, or behaviors of the students who refuse to comply? Is it a change in reporting? Is it really a black problem? I noticed the article said many but didn't give a percentage.

    I'm not saying that these issues aren't important. But with all of the thousands of schools across the country and millions of students (not all well behaved), 28 serious incidents in 5 years isn't surprising especially in this age of harsh punishment or no punishment.

    But what do you propose if, as you pointed out, police in school is also a bad thing? Sadly, kids are violent too and I can almost guarantee if the choice is to remove kids that are misbehaving you will probably see people yelling about the disproportionate number of black students in this category. What's the solution when it is a no-win?
     
  6. Caesar753

    Caesar753 Multitudinous

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,471
    Likes Received:
    2,488

    Feb 23, 2018

    I don't think anyone is saying that these things don't also happen to white students. The claim here, supported by research and statistics that can be found by clicking on those red links, is that students of color (as well as students of all races with disabilities) are disproportionately subjected to them.

    I don't necessarily think that police in school is a bad thing. I support the plan of having a resource officer or two, especially at schools in neighborhoods where crime and drugs are prevalent. I don't, however, support the idea of very heavily armed police, armed teachers, or any sort of plan that turns schools into something that more closely resembles a prison.

    If we're going to be throwing money at this problem in order to pay for grenade launchers and more armed personnel, maybe we could use that money instead to provide additional staff in the way of counselors, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, who could help problem students better address their problems. Perhaps we couse use that money to reduce class sizes so that teachers could focus more attention on fewer students, making stronger and deeper connections that might help identify students who are struggling or even prevent this type of violence from happening in the first place. If the pro-gun people are arguing that this is a mental health issue, then let's spend our money addressing the mental health crisis.
     
  7. a2z

    a2z Maven

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2010
    Messages:
    5,599
    Likes Received:
    1,485

    Feb 23, 2018

    Kids with disabilities are certainly more impacted because they don't process information the same way and have issues that can impact impulse control which then escalates the interaction which is why I pointed out more training for learning how to de-escalate a situation. I also know that many of the black students are angry and tend to lash out and push envelopes which also escalates situations. Again, back to the training.

    I'm not against more counselors, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, but it will be decades before they can make a huge impact. What is the stop gap?

    It isn't just mental health though, it is a society that condones violence, that anything goes, and everyone has to be the top in a society that can instantly, with social media, spread hurt to not just a few but a whole school in minutes.
     
  8. physteach

    physteach Companion

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    24

    Feb 23, 2018

    I asked about these at a recent meeting with our safety guy. He told me that we don't want those because those devices have been used to lock in students to rape them.
     
  9. webmistress

    webmistress Devotee

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    59

    Feb 23, 2018

    Many black parents are saying more guns in school will cause white teachers to murder black students.
     
    Ms.Holyoke and MsAbeja like this.
  10. webmistress

    webmistress Devotee

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,080
    Likes Received:
    59

    Feb 23, 2018

    Quote
    "I know that because the only other group of public employees that is armed at the behest of the state shoots unarmed people of color on the reg. The cops actually receive extensive training on how to use their firearms, how to assess threats, and how to deescalate situations, and yet they still murder innocent civilians all the time.

    Giving a teacher a gun is ASKING them to be afraid. It makes poor judgment a homicidal offense. And that danger will be borne by black and brown students. The students who make teachers “afraid” just by their very existence.


    We’ll be telling teachers to shoot armed terrorists breaching the school. What’s really going to happen is an unarmed black truant loitering in a hallway he’s not supposed to be in who gets shot eight times by the jumpy choir director.


    Oh, she’ll feel just awful about her mistake. But a jury of her peers will never convict her of a crime.

    ------
    America is entirely too racist to arm teachers. Our legal system is INCAPABLE of holding public employees to account for murdering minorities. Black and brown students should not have to die because disgruntled white boys are shooting up their schools."
    https://abovethelaw.com/2018/02/you...ents-getting-murdered-by-their-teacher-right/
     
  11. Obadiah

    Obadiah Groupie

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2015
    Messages:
    1,251
    Likes Received:
    715

    Feb 24, 2018

    I see this as a severe and prevalent problem in education. The curricula, the administration, even the clock is all designed for instant success, at least at an 80% level. Those who do not instantly succeed in a singular task are deemed as learning disabled (often prior to testing) or lazy. Those who fall within the 8/10 range, are assumed to be moving along, but their 1/5 misconception infiltrates the next instantaneously achieved objective, leading to another evaluation of 80% or lower.

    Put adults in this situation. I recently bought my first smart phone. Should I feel not smart enough because of all the mistakes I made (and still make) in learning to use it? How about the first mistake I made in which I accidentally dialed the salesman's phone (I thought I correctly followed the instructions to erase his number) and then desperately tried to hang up before it went to voice mail. How about the first call I received on it. I applied previous learning and tapped the icon. Nothing happened. It kept ringing (or ring toning, or whatever it's called). How was I to know that I needed to slide my finger across the icon?

    Now equate this to the student who must be perfect first time every time. That is a lot of pressure on a kid, every day, year after year. Sometimes it seems like kids need to have movie star qualities; if not, they are labeled. Sometimes I feel like I'm in a game of Lifeboat, where we decide who gets thrown overboard. (Did you ever notice that once a student is thrown overboard in first grade s/he rarely can climb back into the boat)? Mel Levine correlates that student with the one who is targeted by the drug peddlers in the business section, 15 minute drive from my house. (An aside, a recent major drug bust was 5 minutes walking distance from where I lived as a teenager, and a direct route in which kids walk home from the local high school). The right side of the Bell Curve is glorified, yet in a standard classroom, most if not all of the students can progress within that right side of the curve--just not instantaneously. Back to the original purpose of this post, it's no wonder that some kids just can't hack it!
     
    Backroads and Upsadaisy like this.
  12. Caesar753

    Caesar753 Multitudinous

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,471
    Likes Received:
    2,488

    Feb 24, 2018

    Yep.
     

    Attached Files:

    Obadiah and svassillion like this.
  13. catnfiddle

    catnfiddle Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Messages:
    8,270
    Likes Received:
    1,403

    Feb 25, 2018

  14. Backroads

    Backroads Aficionado

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Messages:
    3,104
    Likes Received:
    1,431

    Feb 25, 2018

    In my state, teachers have been allowed to conceal carry for years. No white teacher has murdered a black student. In fact, there haven't been any incidents whatsoever.

    Now, I'm not supporting forcing teachers to be armed, as yes, I think that would increase accidental shootings.

    But what I am saying is that if teachers are already armed in some areas, wouldn't we already have had a racially charged teacher-to-student shooting?
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2018
    Linguist92021 and a2z like this.
  15. blazer

    blazer Connoisseur

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,597
    Likes Received:
    300

    Mar 1, 2018

  16. catnfiddle

    catnfiddle Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Messages:
    8,270
    Likes Received:
    1,403

    Mar 1, 2018

    Oh, it happened.
     
  17. blazer

    blazer Connoisseur

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,597
    Likes Received:
    300

    Mar 1, 2018

    So imagine. Gun goes off, armed teachers in adjacent classrooms hear bang(s) and screams and come running out into hall. 1st person they see is another adult with a gun. Blue on blue? Or armed response arrives from outside and sees adults in halls with guns!
     
  18. Obadiah

    Obadiah Groupie

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2015
    Messages:
    1,251
    Likes Received:
    715

    Mar 1, 2018

    I've had some random thoughts concerning implementations to counter this current dilemma of school violence. These are odd ideas, to be sure, but we're countering odd behavior, also.

    I've been wondering about fire alarms. Currently, as seen in Parkland, anyone can pull an alarm and cause a mass exodus. I'm wondering if there could be a way to electronically verify a fire, it's location (in case someone triggers an alarm with an actual fire), and even eliminate the fire prior to an evacuation. In other words, make it very difficult to force an evacuation of a school building, but at the same time, allow for immediate evacuation when necessary.

    I'm also wondering how prepared modern students' brains are for violent emergencies. I'm comparing modern students to students from when I was young, or even prior time periods.

    Many, if not most, of today's students do not eat a brain healthy diet of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. Could we counter that by offering free lunches with little or no meat, and attractive, tasty vegetarian dishes? I would even suggest making it more palatable with a bit of sugar or honey; as Mary Poppins said, "A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down." Even cookies, cakes, puddings, etc. can be upped nutritiously.

    Something we're already struggling to improve, so I don't know how we can improve on this more than we are, but kids today are not reading. Nothing supports brain growth as much as reading (and other forms of communication). Roald Dahl, in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, recommended eliminating TV's. This was prior to video games and texting so perhaps he would have even furthered his suggestion had he written the book in 2018. I'm not suggesting total elimination of such technology, but I am suggesting, (beyond our control as teachers), that parents monitor tech usage and encourage activities that enhance the upper brain rather than just growing the reactive lower brain. Not only does reading enhance empathetic understanding and logical thinking (of which many if not all of the current violent students lacked), but it produces a brain that can better respond to an emergency situation. In reference to the police training we received at our school, standard procedures were set in place, but alongside of that, we were cautioned of the need to be creative. My thoughts are this: in an emergency students might become devoid of teacher direction and might need to react on their own. A better prepared brain provides better reactions.

    Also concerning brain development, again somewhat out of our control except for what we currently provide, students need more physical exercise and more time outside. When I was a kid, playtime meant outdoors. Of course back then, it was considered safe to explore the entire neighborhood including the wooded areas.

    Back to communication, and this is within our area of outreach, oral communication is essential for brain development, and again, this enhances the areas of the brain that will respond creatively and interact socially during an emergency; by interacting socially, I'm thinking of situations where students, again if devoid of teacher presence, may need to work together in solving a crisis. In the classroom, this is developed through discussions where everyone (including the teacher) listens to each other, everyone is respectfully encouraged to participate, everyone is allowed to disagree (politely), everyone is allowed to change their opinion following further exploration of a topic, in other words, good, healthy talks--appropriate for any subject, such as how can this math formula be used in everyday life? Should ain't be considered improper grammar since at one time it wasn't? What would have happened if this historical even had not occurred?...etc.

    Just some thoughts.
     
  19. Caesar753

    Caesar753 Multitudinous

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    14,471
    Likes Received:
    2,488

    Mar 1, 2018

    Kids not reading isn't what's causing these school shootings, if you ask me. I'm reading Columbine right now, and it stresses pretty early on that both boys were intelligent and well-read, with one of them frequently quoting Shakespeare and Nietzsche. What's more, those boys weren't really the social outcasts like everyone thinks. At least one of them was known to be charming and outgoing, and neither one of them had any trouble getting dates.

    While healthy eating and exercise are good for everyone, I don't think that not getting enough of either is what's causing these shootings, either. I don't think it's violent video games (although I do think that extremely violent games and movies and news stories do desensitize people to violence to some degree). In many cases it doesn't even seem to be bad parenting. Some of these shooters weren't the victims of bullying or abuse, didn't show a lot of warning signs, and seemed to be pretty well-adjusted, happy kids. Those things aren't true for other shooters.

    Honestly, I don't know what it is that triggers some kids/people into deciding to commit a mass shooting and then actually following through with that plan. I suspect that it's a terrible combination of factors, probably including some sort of mental illness or personality disorder along with interest in and access to guns. If we as a society can't or won't address mental health, and it is my strongly held belief that we don't properly address it, then we absolutely must limit access to guns. Without guns, it would be a lot harder for these kids to commit the same kinds of offenses with the same kinds of casualty rates. Yes, they might still do bad things and hurt people, but they won't be spraying bullets like they're the latest scent of Axe Body Spray.
     
    Obadiah, Backroads and ms.irene like this.
  20. ms.irene

    ms.irene Connoisseur

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    721

    Mar 1, 2018

    We don't know anything for sure about what these shooters have in common, except for one thing: easy access to guns and ammunition meant to kill as many people as possible, as fast as possible.

    That is the only reason these guns exist. If you "need" one for hunting, then you suck at hunting.
     
    Upsadaisy, Tyler B. and Obadiah like this.

Share This Page

Members Online Now

  1. Lisabobisa,
  2. bella84,
  3. czacza,
  4. YoungTeacherGuy
Total: 457 (members: 7, guests: 418, robots: 32)
test