# Fair grading practices (The Case Against Zero)

Discussion in 'General Education' started by Caesar753, Nov 12, 2012.

1. ### Caesar753Multitudinous

Joined:
Jun 10, 2007
Messages:
13,963
1,721

Nov 12, 2012

Last week at my school we had a meeting about fair grading practices. We were discussing the equitable distribution of grades, i.e., making an A worth the same number of points as an F. The argument made by the presenters is that on our current 100-point percentage system, there's a huge disparity between the number of points in an F (0-59) and every other letter grade.

I should point out now that I have always agreed with that claim.

Another teacher brought up the fact that As, Bs, Cs, and Ds are all really the same--they're all passing, just different degrees of passing. He pointed out that on our current 100-point percentage system, roughly half the scale is dedicated to "passing" scores and half to "failing". He further pointed out that when we switch the scale to something with a more equitable distribution among letter grades (rather than between simply passing and failing), the same problem originally meant to be eliminated by this scale is still present--just in reverse, resulting in grade inflation.

His argument made a lot of sense to me. I am now finding my own views on the subject to be sort of flip-floppy and on the fence. Can anyone convince me to land on one side of the fence or the other, solidly and securely, confident in whichever system I choose?

3. ### FourSquareFanatic

Joined:
Aug 4, 2009
Messages:
2,698
191

Nov 12, 2012

I don't know. (Honestly.) All my kids are on a modified SPED scale...90-100=A, 80-89=B, 70-79=C, 60-69=D, and below 60=F. I think that's pretty reasonable. Do they really know what they're doing if they can only demonstrate a skill less than 60% of the time? I do weight things different...but with stuff like homework you either do it or you don't. No homework=0. Kids need to make some effort.

4. ### Peregrin5Maven

Joined:
Aug 25, 2011
Messages:
5,621
862

Nov 12, 2012

I don't know either. It seems to me like one of the benefits of the current system is that it encourages students to do more than just pass, but also to excel. This is similar to the other thread in which we talk about B's being academic suicide.

It could be due to grade inflation, but anything less than A's aren't acceptable these days in higher learning institutions, and our goal is to prepare students for these institutions (though there is debate on this point as well).

5. ### FourSquareFanatic

Joined:
Aug 4, 2009
Messages:
2,698
191

Nov 12, 2012

I find even more pressure as a middle school teacher now since my kids will use these grades to apply for selective enrollment high schools. It is highly unlikely they'd get in with B or C averages. Not that I hand out A's...kid's get what they earn...but I suppose it's made me more thoughtful about what and how I grade.

6. ### Caesar753Multitudinous

Joined:
Jun 10, 2007
Messages:
13,963
1,721

Nov 12, 2012

This is our regular scale, although we do incorporate a minimum F (50%) on any work that was reasonably attempted. No attempt still earns 0%.

Joined:
Oct 27, 2007
Messages:
263
0

Nov 12, 2012

Caesar, I am in the same boat......I read "The Case Against Zero" article and agree with it. Then I hear/read the counterarguments, and totally agree with them too! I really don't know where I stand on this issue and am looking forward to others' responses

8. ### Caesar753Multitudinous

Joined:
Jun 10, 2007
Messages:
13,963
1,721

Nov 12, 2012

In my school, that's not the concern. The concern is that inflating grades is moving students from 35% mastery of a topic into "passing" range.

Joined:
Oct 27, 2007
Messages:
263
0

Nov 12, 2012

This is my current policy. I feel like it maintains a balance between both sides.

10. ### SargeEnthusiast

Joined:
Jan 13, 2007
Messages:
2,433
115

Nov 13, 2012

If grades are to be based on skills learned, vs. work completed, then a "zero" would mean zero skills learned.

In standards based grading, a zero grade would then seldom be an accurate reflection of a student's skills because even our lowest performing students rarely learn zero in class. They might behave as if they learned zero, but that is not a accurate measure.

In other words, the student who turns in zero work or just sits there and gets a zero on the test is not giving you an accurate assessment. They may know more than what they demonstrate through the assignment or assessment.

With first grade, we deal with this all the time. A child may know how to read, but not be able to wrap their head around the basic idea of taking a multiple choice test - they mark all the bubbles or choose A for every answer.

Joined:
Nov 22, 2009
Messages:
3,108
0

Nov 13, 2012

Work completed is one way students exhibit it the skills learned. The two are not mutually exclusive, they are symbiotic. As you said, if they don't complete the work or tests, then they've not given the teacher any way to assess the skills learned.

There have been some counter-arguments suggesting students should not have to complete homework if they can demonstrate mastery of the material on the test. I disagree because it is only the very rare student that can fully master and understand the material without any practice. So if we just rely on tests, we - and our students - will more likely see they do NOT understand the material as well as they thought, especially app,ications of the material requiring critical thought and application.

For myself, I've begun giving a 50 as my minimum grade IF the student at least tried to do the work. Te only exception to this is a paper handed in with nothing but a list of answers. That earns a 0 because it only shows me the student can use a calculator or copy their friends' paper. They must show some effort on the work and part of that effort includes showing their work.

12. ### RockguykevConnoisseur

Joined:
Mar 3, 2008
Messages:
1,889
197

Nov 13, 2012

I do not agree with the assertion that all passing grades are the same. If the logic behind that is "well, they pass the class" then I'd note that in most schools until high school they "pass" with an F too.

I think Sarge is right on with his analysis. What exactly do we want our grades to measure? Is it how much they've learned, how much they've done or how much did they attain some previously decided level of mastery? Of course most of our grades are a mixture of all of these (and sometimes include behavior, participation, and bringing in colored pencils...) leading to the confusion.

An additional problem is the fact that, at least in California, a 70% on the state tests is not just proficient but advanced. Should that then 70% the mastery target or should it be 61% for proficient? Should those both be ignored and use Marzano's 80%?

The fact is today's grading policy is a relic. Just like having 6 rows of 6 desks in an industrial setting is a relic. Nibbling around the edges with ideas like equal grade distribution bands is always going to lead a thoughtful person to confusion because the system is broken.

13. ### catnfiddleModerator

Joined:
May 8, 2008
Messages:
7,846
1,053

Nov 13, 2012

My school does really well with a 4-point scale with weights for more complex assignments. For example, a quick multiple choice quiz is worth a weight of 1, but a short answer quiz is a weight of 2. We also throw in pluses and minuses to make it even more fun (I'm so glad the calculations are automatic).

This is similar to what my school uses, but we also have a D- that goes down to a 0.68. We also do not weigh our honors classes, although I think we should.

14. ### Reality CheckHabitué

Joined:
May 29, 2010
Messages:
881
11

Nov 13, 2012

Hmmmmmm.....Sounds similar to my principal's philosophy about social promotion within the school; "What's the difference if we call them 9th, 10th, 11th, or 12th graders? They still haven't graduated." Which is how he defends putting 9th graders into an 11th grade class.

It also sounds like a friend's school in New Jersey, where administration has reminded the teachers, "You know, we don't pay you to do math." (Wink-wink.....give a grade that you THINK the student deserves.)

There's been a growing practice over the years of "smoke and mirrors" in education in attempt to hide the lack of effort of students, parents, and administration (up through the superintendents).

15. ### SargeEnthusiast

Joined:
Jan 13, 2007
Messages:
2,433
115

Nov 13, 2012

Here is what the debate is really about: Should a student's grade reflect mastery of the subject matter, or should it serve as a reward for hard work and effort (or punishment for a lack thereof?)

First of all, I think that those who would advocate giving zeros for work not done, or for tests where no effort was made, see a grade as a carrot and stick to compel otherwise lazy and unmotivated students to perform tasks expected of them.

If a grade is simply a measure of hard work and effort, then does the exceptionallly bright student who can finish in 15 minutes what it takes an ordinary student a hour to do deserve a better grade? After all, the ordinary student is working four times as hard as the exceptional student. His or her grade should be four times better.

When I taught middle school, I had a lot of "very good students" who worked their tails off, but seldom did very well on tests. Back then, however, tests as a means of assessment were considered a no-no. So some of my very hard working studens got good grades, but probably had not mastered the subject matter. Meanwhile, I had some lazy students who would ace the tests and still get D's because they never did any homework.

16. ### Peregrin5Maven

Joined:
Aug 25, 2011
Messages:
5,621
862

Nov 13, 2012

Well if it were up to me, it would be the kid who put in the most effort. I can see how much a kid knows by looking at their test scores. I don't need their grades to inform me of their understanding, but since we aim to teach the whole child, effort and intellect not withstanding, it is my philosophy that grades should be earned through hard work. After all many people in later years will use grades to determine if a student is organized and hard-working. They use things like the SAT and the GRE to determine the understanding and intellect of students.

Like you said, grades are usually a mix of a lot of things, including how much they know and how hard they work.

17. ### a2zPhenom

Joined:
Sep 16, 2010
Messages:
4,708
754

Nov 13, 2012

But again, it goes back to that exceptionally bright and rapid fast student that can finish the 20 problem math sheet in 5 minutes instead of the 30 minutes allotted for completion. If the teacher doesn't have enough "hard work" available for the student, how can that student show the hard work to earn the good grade?

Effort does not always mean accuracy. So that really fast student that completed all of the problems accurately didn't work hard to do so. The student was just highly capable. That student that struggled all 30 minutes and still got 5 wrong worked so much harder but mastered less of the material. How would student A get a good grade if it was the amount of hard work done that determined the grade? 5 minutes of effortless math isn't hard work.

18. ### ShanooHabitué

Joined:
Oct 28, 2007
Messages:
766
2

Nov 13, 2012

I teach junior high. Grades 7, 8 and 9 Math. Our 7s and 8s are on an A,B,C,D scale. Our 9s are on a numerical scale, where they get a percent.

For our 7s and 8s, A means they've mastered all of the content. B means they've mastered most, C means they've mastered some and D means they've mastered very little. When we mark assignments for our 7s and 8s NOTHING is graded numerically. There is no counting up the questions they got right, etc. It's a gut feeling. Do YOU feel they mastered all, most, some or little? Then, when report card time rolls around, based on those assignment marks, how much of the entire course do you feel they've mastered? Passing or failing the year is a separate conversation that we have at the end of the year, after our marks are submitted. We discuss each student in terms of whether we feel they have mastered ENOUGH of the content to be successful the following year. Again, it's a judgement call, backed up with evidence from student work.

Now, our Grade 9s are graded numerically. I don't look at it as there is a disproportionate percent of the grade that is failing (F is 50% of the pie, for example, with A, B, C and D having a 12.5% share). I see it as similar to our Grade 7 and 8 system, except with numbers. A student who gets 30% on an assignment has mastered 30% of the content. A student who gets 85% has mastered 85% of the content.

Now, someone, somewhere, has decided that you need to have mastered at least 50% of the content in order to have a chance at success at the next level. It's not a punishment for stupidity or unintelligence, or laziness. It just is. You can't run until you learn to walk. That doesn't mean that there is a stigma attached to babies who aren't walking yet. They just haven't mastered that particular skill. It also doesn't mean they won't get there.

Now, in terms of giving 0, my policy is such. I don't give a zero until the very last second. The grades for our first report are due tomorrow morning. Those students who haven't handed in work had until the end of the day today to get those assignments in. Those who didn't will get a 0. Why? Because they haven't shown mastery on that assignment as of this date. Therefore, it will reflect as such on this report. Now, if they hand me in those assignments tomorrow? I'll mark them. For full credit. But I won't change THIS report's mark. It will be reflected on next report. Why? Because it was during next report's time that they showed the mastery (at whatever percent mastered they can do).

19. ### orangeteaConnoisseur

Joined:
Jan 12, 2012
Messages:
1,607
0

Nov 13, 2012

It would be the kids who aced the tests, because they are the ones who understood the material. However, if they did not homework or other assignments, their grades should be reduced.

In my class, homework is worth 10% of the term grade, while tests and quizzes at 90%. A student who does no homework (which is important to reinforce skills and to attempt critical thinking problems which may not be tested) will not earn an A if they choose not to complete the assignments. If a student can ace tests with zero work outside of class, they should probably be bumped up a level.

A student should not be able to get an A just because he/she tries hard. Homework is my effort grade, because I just check for completion. It's important that a student's grade represents the student's mastery of the material so that we can place them in the correct level next year. If a student gets an A in 8th grade math just because of effort and not mastery, he will struggle in 9th grade math.

20. ### BrendanFanatic

Joined:
Jul 2, 2004
Messages:
2,977
0

Nov 13, 2012

Call me old fashioned, but I think grades can and should reflect something more than mastery in high school and middle school. I think students need to be taught how to achieve mastery (via completing homework accurately and correctly in the humanities) and this should be factored into their grade.

Joined:
Sep 2, 2010
Messages:
648